Locked Candidates let you remove a digit by combining two units at their intersection.
You do not know the exact cell that will contain the digit. What you know is more subtle:
Every possible position for this digit in one unit lies inside the same overlap with another unit.
That restriction is enough to eliminate the digit elsewhere.
There are two directions:
- Pointing: box → row or column.
- Claiming / Box-Line Reduction: row or column → box.
- Source candidates
- Eliminations
The rule in one sentence
Pointing
If every candidate for digit X inside a box lies on the same row or column, remove X from that line outside the box.
Claiming
If every candidate for digit X inside a row or column lies in the same box, remove X from that box outside the line.
The logic is identical. Only the starting unit changes.
Why Locked Candidates work
Suppose box 5 still needs digit 6.
Inside that box, 6 can appear only in two cells, and both are on row 4.
You cannot yet say which source cell is 6.
But one of them must be 6 because the box still needs that digit.
Therefore row 4 will receive its 6 somewhere inside box 5.
Any other candidate 6 on row 4 outside box 5 would then duplicate the digit in the row.
So those outside candidates are impossible.
This is the key intermediate idea:
A digit can be forced into a region of the grid before it is forced into one exact cell.
That regional restriction is enough to make progress.
Pointing: box → line
Start with a box.
Ask:
Where can digit X still go in this box?
If every remaining position shares one row, the box points along that row.
If every remaining position shares one column, the box points down that column.
Claiming: line → box
Now reverse the question.
Start with a row or column.
Ask:
Where can digit X still go in this line?
If all remaining positions lie inside one box, the line claims the digit for that box.
The source unit must be complete
Locked Candidates are only valid when you have identified all remaining positions for the digit in the source unit.
For Pointing:
Are these genuinely all possible Xs in the box?
For Claiming:
Are these genuinely all possible Xs in the row or column?
If a legitimate candidate was accidentally omitted from your notes, you can create a false pattern.
That is why accurate candidates become increasingly important at Intermediate level.
Pointing does not require exactly two candidates
The name Pointing Pair is common, but the general logic can also use three cells.
Inside one box, the intersection with a particular row contains at most three cells.
If digit 2 can appear in all three of those cells — and nowhere else in the box — the box still guarantees that row will receive digit 2 inside the box.
The elimination outside the box remains valid.
VeyraPlay therefore uses:
- Pointing Pairs as the familiar public page title;
- Pointing Candidates when explaining the general principle.
What Locked Candidates usually unlock
The direct result is normally an elimination, not a placement.
But look at what can follow:
Locked Candidates
↓
remove candidate 6
↓
cell becomes {2}
↓
Naked Single 2
↓
peer candidates update
↓
new Hidden SingleThis is why Intermediate Sudoku feels different from Beginner Sudoku: the useful move may be one or two logical steps away from the next visible digit.
How to search efficiently
Locked Candidates are easier to find digit-first.
Pointing scan
- Choose one digit.
- Move through each box that still needs it.
- Look at the remaining candidate positions.
- Ask whether they all share one line.
- If yes, inspect that line outside the box.
Claiming scan
- Keep the same digit selected.
- Move through rows and columns with few remaining positions.
- Ask whether all positions fall inside one box.
- If yes, inspect the rest of that box.
This is more reliable than staring at every candidate set at once.
Locked Candidates vs Hidden Single
These techniques differ by how tightly the digit is restricted.
Hidden Single
One digit has one possible cell in the unit.
→ Place the digit.
Locked Candidates
One digit has multiple possible cells, but those cells are confined to one box-line intersection.
→ Eliminate the digit elsewhere.
A useful mental progression is:
one position
→ Hidden Single
multiple positions on one intersection
→ Locked CandidatesLocked Candidates vs subsets
Locked Candidates follow one digit across overlapping units.
Pairs and Triples follow several digits reserved for several cells inside one unit.
If a candidate filter on one digit looks interesting, intersections are a good search family.
If several small candidate sets look related, subsets may be the better family.
Common mistakes
Eliminating from the source cells
Those are the cells that must keep the digit.
Pointing eliminates from the line outside the box.
Claiming eliminates from the box outside the line.
Assuming “pair” means exactly two cells
Pointing can also use three aligned source cells.
Using only part of the source unit
The restriction must describe all valid positions for the digit in that source unit.
Treating the pattern as a solved placement
Locked Candidates tell you where the digit cannot go elsewhere. They do not usually decide which source cell is true.
Applying a pattern that produces no elimination
The restriction can exist without any candidate to remove. It is logically true, but it is not currently a productive solving step.
A useful verbal check
Before deleting anything, say the deduction in one sentence:
“The 5 for this box must be somewhere on row 6, so row 6 cannot contain 5 anywhere else.”
or:
“The 8 for this column must be inside this box, so the rest of the box cannot contain 8.”
If that sentence is not fully justified by the candidate state, do not make the elimination.
FAQ
Are Pointing Pairs the same as Locked Candidates?
Pointing is one of the two main Locked Candidates directions. Claiming / Box-Line Reduction is the other.
What are Locked Candidates Type 1 and Type 2?
A common solver naming convention is:
- Type 1 = Pointing;
- Type 2 = Claiming.
Can Locked Candidates use a column?
Yes. Every row-based explanation has a column equivalent.
Can Locked Candidates solve a cell immediately?
Usually the direct move is an elimination, but the elimination may create a Single.
Should I learn Pointing and Claiming separately?
Yes. The umbrella logic is the same, but training the two search directions separately makes the pattern much easier to recognize.
What to learn next
Study Pointing Pairs and Box-Line Reduction as separate search directions, then move into Naked Pairs and Hidden Pairs.